XML 2.0 Schema

Mission | Goals |FAQs | Compliance | Schemas 2.0, 1.2, 1.1 | Posts | White Paper | Members

EDRM XML 2.0 downloads:

We welcome your comments on any of the files above, or any other aspect of version 2.0 of the EDRM XML schema. Please comment below.
Please complete the following to download file

Your Name *

Your Email *

Your Organization

Organization Type
AssociationCorporationGovernmentLaw FirmProvider

Joining EDRM
Please contact me about EDRM membership

Subscribe me to the mailing list

Please complete the following to download file

Your Name *

Your Email *

Your Organization

Organization Type
AssociationCorporationGovernmentLaw FirmProvider

Joining EDRM
Please contact me about EDRM membership

Subscribe me to the mailing list

Please complete the following to download file

Your Name *

Your Email *

Your Organization

Organization Type
AssociationCorporationGovernmentLaw FirmProvider

Joining EDRM
Please contact me about EDRM membership

Subscribe me to the mailing list

Please complete the following to download file

Your Name *

Your Email *

Your Organization

Organization Type
AssociationCorporationGovernmentLaw FirmProvider

Joining EDRM
Please contact me about EDRM membership

Subscribe me to the mailing list

9 comments to XML 2.0 Schema

  • Michael Finn

    In the Document Element, I would like to add the size in bytes of the document. What is the recommended way of doing this? If the solution is to add a FieldValues element, is there a convention for usage of the Key attribute value?

  • barryhagan

    Why is the type for SeqKey and ParentKey in the XSD set to xs:unsignedByte? This means I can only have 256 documents in any EDRM XML.

    • darmstrong

      Any update on this? I was wondering the same thing today.

      • Quentin

        I think XML 2.0 is not official yet and just a draft available for comment. I will make sure this feedback gets considered in the next draft. Certainly many more than 256 documents should be covered.

        • svudayagiri

          Any update on this please? Seqkey as an unsignedByte is very limiting.

          Also the XML 2.0 draft seems to have been around for couple of years now. Any dates when this would be finalized?

          Is it recommended to use XML 1.2 until 2.0 is finalized and released?

          • We appreciate your interest in EDRM XML. Development on EDRM XML 2.0 has proceeded at a slower pace than we would like. It is a matter of resources, namely the availability of individuals interested in bringing the 2.0 schema to a point that enables use. We will continue to pursue the 2.0 schema, and hopefully will have something to report in early 2014. Of course, this is also an opportunity for you to become engaged in EDRM and join the XML team. Please contact me if you are ready to join and get involved.

Leave a Reply